Get in touch

Comments, objections, and substantive questions about the project are welcome. The most useful correspondence is that which identifies a specific problem with a specific claim or argument — either a premise that is false, an inference that does not hold, or a phenomenon that the account fails to handle.

Please include a reference to the specific concept, claim, or paper you are responding to. General comments about the project's overall direction are less useful than targeted engagements with particular positions.

For academic correspondence

Papers submitted to peer-reviewed venues are publicly identified by their titles and target venues. Academic correspondence about submitted papers is best directed through the journal's review process.